| Image Comments |
| rayl | 09-Jan-17 14:11 |
| Waiting of decal Paper from MicroMark anf the courage to start the rigging. I used the 1mm "stretchy" cord for the elevator&rudder cables. |
| Huey V77 | 09-Jan-17 14:44 |
| Very nice ray, hard to believe that this actually flew. Very nice! |
| biplane guy | 09-Jan-17 15:31 |
| That looks great! |
| Skyediamonds1985 | 09-Jan-17 16:25 |
| Rayl, this is absolutely gorgeous. Beautifully crafted and executed. Really enjoyed the attention to the details. Great job. |
| John M Oshust | 09-Jan-17 16:36 |
| This is wonderful. GFWM! |
| LASTWOODSMAN | 09-Jan-17 21:33 |
| To the wilds of the uncharted wilderness in Alaska, where the rivers run free, choked with spawning salmon, to the sea - here we come... |
| Skyediamonds1985 | 10-Jan-17 16:27 |
| Rayl, just a quick question. I looked in your previous postings and couldn't find any references to how you fabricated the front engine face and the flanges that went between the cylinders. Don C, if he decides on the Walrus, I've got the photo-documentation. |
| rayl | 10-Jan-17 17:59 |
| NO Walrus!!! I was referring to the time it takes for a mama Walrus to bring a cub to term. Sky: the pictures are there. |
| Don C | 10-Jan-17 18:28 |
| :) |
| Huey V77 | 10-Jan-17 18:42 |
| How about a Suskorsky S-38 ? It needs salt water also. :-) |
| rayl | 10-Jan-17 20:27 |
| Possibly a Sikorsky S-39, maybe a Widgeon. Would love to do a Curtiss NC-4, but the 94 in. W/S (in 1/16 scale) doesn't seem feasible. A P-82 would be fun also. |
| poppy | 11-Jan-17 06:07 |
| This is JFB!!!!!! If this isn't museum quality, then nothing is! |
| rayl | 12-Jan-17 09:47 |
| Again, Thanks for all of your kind comments. I don't know about the Museum Quality but; Thank You Poppy. |
| LASTWOODSMAN | 12-Jan-17 10:55 |
| Real planes had round engines and two wings ... |
| hjlittman | 13-Jan-17 14:51 |
| Have to admire this. It is coming along very, very nicely. |
